<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linking Strategies Explored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twresourcegroup.com/linking-strategies-explored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twresourcegroup.com/linking-strategies-explored/</link>
	<description>Affordable Small Business Marketing Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.twresourcegroup.com/linking-strategies-explored/comment-page-1/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twresourcegroup.com/2007/06/19/linking-strategies-explored/#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>I was thinking about this one the other day and here is the thought. Google doesn&#039;t penalize sites for gaining massive links from Digg or if it was linked too by many bloggers. So I think the gaining of links to fast may be a tad over rated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about this one the other day and here is the thought. Google doesn&#8217;t penalize sites for gaining massive links from Digg or if it was linked too by many bloggers. So I think the gaining of links to fast may be a tad over rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.twresourcegroup.com/linking-strategies-explored/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twresourcegroup.com/2007/06/19/linking-strategies-explored/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>It is also good to avoiding link building software to generate a lot of backlinks quickly. The slow and steady way is safe and trusted. Good point regarding the variety of linking strategies. If social media is the only outlet then other opportunities will be over looked, thanks for the reminder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also good to avoiding link building software to generate a lot of backlinks quickly. The slow and steady way is safe and trusted. Good point regarding the variety of linking strategies. If social media is the only outlet then other opportunities will be over looked, thanks for the reminder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Richey aka Las Vegas Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.twresourcegroup.com/linking-strategies-explored/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Richey aka Las Vegas Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twresourcegroup.com/2007/06/19/linking-strategies-explored/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>You have to be careful that you aren&#039;t too successful in gaining links. Gaining links too fast will also get you a google penalty too. I think you have include social networking into your link building strategies along with reciprocals, one way links, directories, etc. Best not to have all of your eggs in one basket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to be careful that you aren&#8217;t too successful in gaining links. Gaining links too fast will also get you a google penalty too. I think you have include social networking into your link building strategies along with reciprocals, one way links, directories, etc. Best not to have all of your eggs in one basket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
